Classified Listings

Find jobs, housing, for sale, personals, services, local community, and events.

USA Online local classifieds

Community - politics classifieds in denver

<![CDATA["No wonder you're so ignorant and easily lead. Your public education explains it all. Too bad you didn't learn anything useful in your public school system. Just goes to show the liberal indoctrination of our public school system. Really, nothing to be proud of." Aha. *You* bitch and moan and complain when someone doesn't answer what *you* feebly put forth as a question, then *you* do the same thing. *You* didn't answer my question, you just went into slinging shit at me, doing EXACTLY what numerous of your high-minded (well, in YOUR mind, at least)posats bleat about others doing...know what my public school education taught me about assholes like you? You're a fucking chickenshit, cowardly hypocrite. I think you'll find LOTS of agreement with that observation, you putz. or, as you so stupidly like to post, you fucking coward... STUPENDOUS. ]]>

<![CDATA[Well, you've just proven to many people that you are unfortunately an uneducated and unarticulate Republican. You respond with no facts. Did you know that 665,000 of our soldiers have been injured in the Iraq war? That includes deaths, brain trauma as well as psychological trauma. Read something with information in it before you speak or post or breed.;-) Did you now that we are in the highest amount of national debt ever due to our current leaders? An easy fact to look up. ref. wikipedia As of April 2008, the total U.S. federal debt was approximately $9.5 trillion[2], about $31,100 per capita (that is, per U.S. resident). Of this amount, debt held by the public was roughly $5.3 trillion.[3] If, in addition, unfunded Medicaid, Social Security, etc. promises are added, this figure rises to a total of $59.1 trillion.[4] In 2007 the public debt was 36.8 percent of GDP ranking 65th in the world.[5] The total debt is currently 66.5% of GNP. You are the type of Republican that gives the rest of us and Americans a bad name. I for one, do not wish to be represented by low level ingrates who use derogatory terms to debate 'truth' issues. I will vote for Obama this November. <a href="http://my.barackobama.com" rel="nofollow">http://my.barackobama.com</a> Spread the word!]]>

<![CDATA[Sounds like one of those broke people who signs their paycheck on the back as well as living paycheck to paycheck. Why don't you get off your ass and make so much money that you pay your taxes quarterly and do so gladly. There is more opportunity to make money in this country if you'll bother to look outside your trailer-park.]]>

<![CDATA[No wonder you're so ignorant and easily lead. Your public education explains it all. Too bad you didn't learn anything useful in your public school system. Just goes to show the liberal indoctrination of our public school system. Really, nothing to be proud of. "But when you went to school, the teacher's union thought it was more important that you be indoctrinated in the man made, global warming hoax..." Yep..learned that at my public grade school, my public junior high, then my parochial (Jesuit) high school, then my publically-supported Uni of Denver. I also learned about the Holocaust in all four; pray tell, my sweet repug dimwit; is that a hoax, too?]]>

<![CDATA[Lies of Aggression by Paul Craig Roberts Anti-War.com <a href="http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=12846" rel="nofollow">http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=12846</a> May 16, 2008 Suck on some truth, you cowardly Republican pieces of shit: Excerpt: It is not Iran that is threatening war. It is Bush. It is not Bush who is appeasing. It is Iran. Iran has not responded in kind to any of Bush's warlike moves and provocations. Iran has not sunk a single one of our sitting duck ships and has not given the Iraqi insurgents any weapons that would easily turn the tide of war against the US. It is Bush, not Iran, who sounds like Adolf Hitler blustering and threatening. It is Bush's American Brownshirts, the neocons, who express the view: "what's the good of nuclear weapons if you can't use them." It is the US that is funding assassination teams inside Iran and using taxpayer dollars to fund dissident and violent organizations opposed to the Iranian government. Iran is doing no such thing here. ]]>

<![CDATA["But when you went to school, the teacher's union thought it was more important that you be indoctrinated in the man made, global warming hoax..." Yep..learned that at my public grade school, my public junior high, then my parochial (Jesuit) high school, then my publically-supported Uni of Denver. I also learned about the Holocaust in all four; pray tell, my sweet repug dimwit; is that a hoax, too?]]>

<![CDATA[Today the CEO of XOM asked why we aren't drilling and producing our own oil resources. Instead we have the spectacle of our president asked the Saudis to increase production-disgusting. So what is it liberals, when gas was cheap you bitched and moaned that we had to put upwards of a .50/gal tax to reduce consumption so as to decrease CO2. Now that you've got your high gas price, how's it feel? If you'd let XOM do what it does best, that is bring oil to market, coupled with nuclear power, we could be be very close to not relying on imports. Not for you liberals, well you got what you wanted. A pristine swamp land the size of Texas that not one of you will ever visit and sky high gas. Oh that's right, see nnl's FIRST rule of life. A liberal will never, never, ever admit a mistake and will never change future behavior to correct said mistake but will try the same thing(high taxes, public schools, cut and run...) action over and over and expect different results! STUPENDOUS]]>

<![CDATA[I just checked my bank account on-line. $600 as promised. I'm stimulated! Now I'm set for beer money for awhile - keeping it in the country (spuds). Did the long form by hand on my taxes also. Mailed it on the 14th. No turbo tax crap, do it myself - missing nothing.]]>

<![CDATA[What comedic relief! Someone actually claiming their public school education is proof they are well educated. The circle is complete! Now you can send your children off to those bastions of knowledge, secure in your little undies that, by god, they're going to get the same, fantastic education you received. STUPENDOUS! If you had been taught history or even read a couple of my previous posts, you would understand why asking who the president was during the last 6 years of the Vietnam War is irrelevant to millions being killed in the mid 70s because of liberal treachery. But when you went to school, the teacher's union thought it was more important that you be indoctrinated in the man made, global warming hoax or taught how to put condoms on bananas. But American History, not Howard Zinn, you little commie, but real western ciz, not a chance. It's why to this day, you can't argue with facts, but always attack me personally, throw in some left field, straw man argument and never once answer or address my points. It's why you can actually believe that our government planted TNT in the WTC or that George Bush actually started the war to enrich his oil buddies. I'd have to say the teacher's unions have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams. ABSOLUTELY FANTASTIC ]]>

<![CDATA[Screw you and screw your liberal faggot "facts." You and your "facts" are just a liberal distraction from the truth. We Republicans know what we know, and your stinkin' "facts" have a well known liberal bias. ]]>

<![CDATA[Anybody wanna go out and murder some unborn babies this weekend? I figure, for us left-wingers, killing unborn babies is like going to a baseball game for everyone else. It's always best to murder your own countrymen while in the womb. Perhaps afterward, we can go down to Cherry Creek and advocate the faggot lifestyle as a way to wind down.]]>

<![CDATA[Neville Chamberlin was a conservative, not a liberal. The senator GWB referred to in his disgraceful speech yesterday was a Republican from Idaho. Oops. I guess you forgot that part. Chamberlin's mistake wasn't in talking, but in appeasing. He was a pussy and a coward. Barack Obama is neither. The most outspoken critic of the Munich Accords was a liberal. His name was Churchill. You probably haven't heard of him, NNL. Try google. There were American Nazi sympathizers as well. Among the was Prescott Bush. Oh! There's that name again! Why do you think that is? ]]>

<![CDATA[Refresh my memory- which Democrat was President for the last six years of the Vietman War. Was it Nixon, or Ford? Both? Lies in the MSM? Care to name one? Still waiting for your Olbermann rebuttal. BTW, when was the last time you visited a public school? Or do you get your expertise on that subject the same place you get it on every subject? Perhaps at the Limbaugh institute? Loser.]]>

<![CDATA[The White House released a statement yesterday saying it was going to help Saudi Arabia develop "peaceful nuclear energy." Yeah, just like the Iranians say they're developing. Only, Saudi Arabia is the country from which hijackers flew 3 planes into buildings on Sep. 11, 2001. (and one into the ground) They have oil. What do they need nuclear power for? ]]>

<![CDATA[Just a moment ago, in response to George W. Bush's and John McCain's attack on Obama as "appeasing" Iran and terrorist organizations, Obama said, "If George Bush and John McCain want to have a debate about protecting the United States of America, that is a debate I am happy to have any time, any place, and that is a debate that I will win, because George Bush and John McCain have a lot to answer for." Obama pointed out that we're in our sixth year of war in Iraq, no WMD have ever been found, we were told the war would last only a few months and cost a tiny fraction of what it has actually cost, and the occupation has not made us safer. He added that Osama bin Laden is still at large, and Al Qaeda is stronger than ever because "we took our eye off the ball in Afghanistan." He then noted that Iran - the country Bush and McCain accuse Obama of appeasing - has been the greatest beneficiary of their bumbling foreign policy and course in Iraq, and that both Iran and Hamas are stronger because of these policies. Video Here: <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/16/12470/0432/719/516952" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/16/12470/0432/719/516952</a>]]>

<![CDATA[Two years ago, McCain said it was ok to work with Hamas. Now? The most hypocritical politician of our time says it's a mistake to work with Hamas, or pretty much any other government we have trouble with. And he has the gall to attack Obama's reasonable approach. ]]>

<![CDATA["Those who think as >>===> are finding themselves obsolete and inconsequential to the survival of the United States." WELL PUT! A little over their heads, but well put.]]>

<![CDATA["a neocon is someone new to conservatism." Nice try. You are living in never never land.]]>

<![CDATA[Many democrat women claiming to represent millions in their party feel CNBC's Chris Mathews along with Howard Dean and others are playing the race card and dissing Hillary. These more than a handful of women are pissed and willing to vote for McCain in many instances if Hillary is not the nominee. They feel that if she's not the nominee, it's because of the forementioned people/media outlet. You be the judge, can you see any of this from the CNBC coverage and comments of these people? If not mistaken, women (not surprisingly) in the democrat party are the majority. About 19% blacks are registered voters. Obama's going to need that 90% black vote to hold up I guess.]]>

<![CDATA[I am grown up. Been there, done that, have seen you liberals screw the pooch over and over and over. And never have I seen a liberal take responsibility. To this day, you won't take responsibility for millions of murders in SE Asia because of stabbing our allies, the South Vietnamese, in the back. Your non-stop lies in the MSM has emboldened our enemies in Iraq which have needlessly killed 100s of our troops and 1,000s of Iraqis. Even now, with that big vein on your forehead throbbing and spittle flying, you're casting about for yet another laughable rationalization. And here's a definition sonny, a neocon is someone new to conservatism. I've been onto the lies of liberalism for over 40 years, so I'm just a plain conservative. Conservatism beats your brand of horseshit when ever it's tried. Sadly, my side keeps trotting out liberal lite. The post was hardly hysterical. A sober quote, no where near fear mongering(your speciality, BTW) and a sober comment. Fact is, when any thought doesn't fit your template, first attack me, never answer or address any of my points and launch off into tin foil land. WELL DONE]]>

<![CDATA[If I'm not mistaken, Republicans seem to have trouble understanding the difference between some commonly used words. Maybe this will help you morons understand that talking, or negotiating, isn't the same as appeasing, and that military action isn't necessarily a sign of courage or strength. talk: a: to express or exchange ideas by means of spoken words b: to convey information or communicate in any way negotiate: a: to deal with (some matter or affair that requires ability for its successful handling) : manage b: to arrange for or bring about through conference, discussion, and compromise <negotiate a treaty> appease: to buy off (an aggressor) by concessions usually at the sacrifice of principles ]]>

<![CDATA[Fanning the flames of created "truth" again? Good grief, you're being led by the fearmongering neocons again. Is it at all possible for you to think for yourself? Can you actually process a thought without being told what to do by those people? We're all in this together, we all have different ways of thinking, and we all are able to figure it out and make it work, EXCEPT when allowed to subscribe to a single train of thought, such as what happened in Nazi Germany. Get your act together, quit your hysterics, and grow up.]]>

<![CDATA[This from the Prime Minister of Great Britain in the 1930s, Stanley Baldwin. I think it is well also for the man in the street to realize that there is no power on earth that can protect him from being bombed. What ever people tell him, the bomber will always get through. The only defense is in offense, which means you must kill more of him more quickly than the enemy will kill you if you ever want to save your selves. If the conscience of our young man should ever come to feel that the bombing of those that would seek to kill us is evil, that this instrument should go, well then the thing will be done. If they do not feel like that, well, as I say, the future is in their hands. But when the next war comes, and it will, and European civilization is wiped out, as it will, and by no more than that force, than do not lay the blame on the old men. Let them remember that they, and they alone, are responsible for the terrors that have fallen on the earth. I've always said that being a liberal means NEVER, NEVER, EVER having to look on your past mistakes, man up, take responsibility, and make corrected actions in the future. Sadly, as the storm clouds of war gathered over Europe in the 30s, Mr Baldwin saw a growing pacifist movement in Great Britain. Even to point of point of trying to talk to the Nazis, who he tried to convince himself could be reasoned with, ala Chamberlin. The point of citing his quote is that liberals, in so many ways, try to ignore human nature. Forget the liberal economic idiocy, forget the liberal education idiocy, leave out so many continued errors liberals make in all walks of life, and keep REPEATING them. Just look to war. Enemies are emboldened by weakness, always have, always will. When your have the walking disaster that is Obama agreeing to non-conditional talks with the world's worst dictators, it's no wonder that Hezbollah want him to be president. They know they will turn him like he's on a spit. It happened throughout history and will happen again. But liberals ignore this and think, THIS TIME it'll be different. Millions will die and like Baldwin said, don't blame the old men. We've tried to warn you but when you forsake your culture, your traditions, time tested for 100s of years and rely on the vacuus ramblings of an inexperienced politician, madness and death lie ahead ]]>

<![CDATA[That (REx3: guy) is simply another case where the "conservatives" who wish to argue those facts and quotes that simply don't exist so they "create" those facts and or quotes, repeat them over and over, blame the Liberals, and whine when people call their bluff. The shallowness of the modern "conservative" philosophy is becoming apparent to the population; their pompous drugged windbag spokesman of the airwaves is finally being recognized for what he is and so are they.]]>

<![CDATA["you know, you're right. GWB caused Katrina. there were some tornadoes out east that were also his fault. please also include the recent earthquake in China as well. also, GWB is to blame for the cooking of the books at Enron and the fact that Martha Stewart is a felon. Let us too, lay blame on GWB for the fact that American auto makers cut corners on quality for years losing many customers. Not to mention the choice made by companies such as Dell, Samsonite and many others who chose to outsource their manufacturing and support departments made easy by the signing of the NAFTA Bill." *You* said it; no one else has, and you KEEP repeating it. Me thinkest the lady doth protesteth too much.... ]]>

<![CDATA[The only rationale I have for voting for McCain is he, once again, is the lesser of two evils. I have a choice. Either vote for a Liberal Republican who has one or two attributes that I prefer or vote for a far left, extreme, radical, terrorist sympathizing and supporting, ultra liberal Democrat that represents everything that I stand against. Gad, that makes me grind my teeth when I read it! Voting for the lesser of two evils is still evil and evil really enjoys your "wasted vote." Will you be part of the problem or part of the solution this year? How bad does evil have to get before you quit voting for it? There are more than 2 choices!! The only reason "minor" party candidates are minor candidates is because of this mentality. Find someone on the ballot that you can vote FOR, and then do it! The only "Wasted vote" is the vote you cast for what you don't support!]]>

<![CDATA[you know, you're right. GWB caused Katrina. there were some tornadoes out east that were also his fault. please also include the recent earthquake in China as well. also, GWB is to blame for the cooking of the books at Enron and the fact that Martha Stewart is a felon. Let us too, lay blame on GWB for the fact that American auto makers cut corners on quality for years losing many customers. Not to mention the choice made by companies such as Dell, Samsonite and many others who chose to outsource their manufacturing and support departments made easy by the signing of the NAFTA Bill. you're right. you're always right.]]>

<![CDATA[Just like Katrina, Bush did not CAUSE the mortgage and credit failures. Just like Katrina, the Bush administrations bumbling incompetency took a bad situation and made it much much worse than it could have been, and denial adds to that incompetentcy. Wake up and grow up. Bush has screwed up corporations, his military service, and his family; denying that has led to the complete screwing up of a FUNCTIONAL government. The government is broken now because the he and the neocons pulling his strings broke it.]]>

<![CDATA[AGENDA OF MEXICAN INVADERS................there are now 38 million Mexican flag wavers in this once great nation now! WORKING FOR OPEN BORDERS ARE: FEINSTEIN, BOXER, WAXMAN, PELOSI, BACA, FARR, HARMAN, ESHOO, LOFGREN, and the U. S. Chamber of Commerce fighting to depress wages for legals. CLINTON, OBAMA, McCAIN KENNEDY, REID and of course the corporate pimp, GEORGE THE MORON. Lou Dobbs Tonight Monday, February 11, 2008 In California, League of United Latin American Citizens has adopted a resolution to declare "California Del Norte" a sanctuary zone for immigrants. The declaration urges the Mexican government to invoke its rights under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo "to seek third-nation neutral arbitration of ....disputes concerning immigration laws and their enforcement." We’ll have the story. Last year, Prince William County, Virginia passed an initiative to allow local police to check the immigration status of anyone in police custody. The county recently held its first immigration training session for local police officers. We’ll have a look inside the training. Mexican President Felipe Calderon is in New York today on the first leg his five-day tour across America to meddle in immigration issues in the United States. This is his first visit to the U.S. since he became President in 2006, but he will not meet with President Bush or any of the presidential candidates, who he has accused of spewing anti-immigrant rhetoric. Join us for that report. ....................... Audio clips of the true agenda of Illegal Alien Lobby Agendas of MEChA, La Raza, MALDEF, and Southwest Voter Registration Projects This is a compilation of live, recorded statements by elected U.S. politicians, college professors, and pro-illegal alien activists whose objective is to take control of our country "by vote if possible and violence if necessary!" The speakers listed below are not the "lunatic fringe". They are some of the most powerful Latino leaders and politicians in America, whose allegiance is to foreigners of their ethnic group, not to the United States. They seek political power and realize the way to get it is to flood America with legal and illegal immigrants from their ethnic "tribe". Simply by demographics, they will dilute the vote of American citizens and replace our American culture. "The Third World" is at your doorstep and anxious to present you with the bill as they jump on "the entitlement bandwagon." If you think this is an exaggeration, you have only to witness California as a forewarning of where our entire country is headed. A very sinister message being taught in many Ethnic Studies programs across this country. While MEChA and LA Raza, the two largest Latino organizations on college and high school campuses preach hatred for America, the liberal media ignores them, as the Ford, Rockefeller, Carnegie and other Foundations contribute millions to promote their anarchy. Pro-illegal immigration activists would have you believe "illegals" are coming here only to seek work and a better life. MEChA, LA Raza, MALDEF and the Southwest Voter Registration Project have much darker agendas. Listen to the following audio clips to understand their message. "We call things racism just to get attention. We reduce complicated problems to racism, not because it is racism, but because it works." --- Alfredo Gutierrez, political consultant, as quoted by Richard de Uriarte, The Phoenix Gazette, March 14, 1992 (quoted in The ProEnglish Advocate, 1st quarter, 2002). The above audio clips are from archives distributed by the California Coalition for Immigration Reform. THE AMERICAN RESISTANCE assumes no responsibility for possible errors in recording, attribution, or transcription. The first 15 audio clips above demonstrate the "Pro-Mexico, Anti-America" agenda of "Pro-Immigration" activists and politicians. Rather than encouraging new immigrants and illegal aliens to assimilate into the American culture, they instead seek to "set up a nation within a nation"; one that they can control by keeping immigrants out of the mainstream. They seek "raw political power" with the goal of open borders. Many helped to found and still support such openly racist, anti-American organizations like MEChA, LA RAZA, MALDEF and the Southwest Voter Registration Project. Their goals are to re-take the American Southwest, not by war, but rather by uncontrolled migration. If you think it's not a problem in your state, it will be eventually, as you become a citizen of "MEXAMERICA". Additional audio/video Former Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo "I have proudly affirmed that the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders and that Mexican migrants are an important - a very important - part of it." -- Former Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo at the National Council of La Raza (The Race) Soiree, Chicago on July 23, 1997 The true agenda of The Race Industry Harvard Professor Samuel P. Huntington, Chairman of the Harvard Academy for International and Area Studies - a self-described "old-fashioned Democrat" - warned in his April 2004 article, "The Hispanic Challenge": "Demographically, socially, and culturally, the reconquista (re-conquest) of the Southwest United States by Mexican immigrants is well underway... No other immigrant group in U.S. history has asserted or could assert a historical claim to U.S. territory. Mexicans and Mexican Americans can and do make that claim." In December 2004, the Mexican government published a guide advising illegal Mexican nationals on how to safely cross the U.S. border. In 2001, Ernesto Ruffo Appel, Mexico’s Commissioner for Northern Border Affairs, reportedly told potential illegal Mexican migrants: "If the border patrol agent finds you, try again." Other Mexican government officials have said: "I have proudly affirmed that the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders and that Mexican migrants are an important - a very important - part of it." --1997, Ernest Zedillo, former President of Mexico, in Chicago. "We are practicing La Reconquista in California." --1998, Jose Pescador Osuna, then-Consul General of Mexico, in California. "We are Mexicans that live in our territories and we are Mexicans that live in other territories. In reality, we are 120 million people that live together and are working together to construct a nation." --2004, Vicente Fox, President of Mexico, in Chicago. Leaders of Mexican ancestry in the United States have made similar statements: "As goes the Latino population will go the state of California, and as goes the state of California will go the United States of America. My friends, the stakes are big. This is a fight worth making." --1995, Henry Cisneros, former U.S. Housing and Urban Development Secretary, at a Hispanic conference at UC Riverside. "Eventually, we are going to take over all the political institutions of California." --1998, Mario Obledo, co-founder of MALDEF and California Secretary of Health & Welfare under Gov. Jerry Brown. (He added that California will soon become an "Hispanic state" and that anyone who does not like Mexicans "should go back to Europe.") "Mexico is recovering the territories yielded to the United States by means of migratory tactics." -- 2001, Elena Poniatowska, a prize-winning Mexican novelist who has taught at Harvard, Yale and Princeton. "A secessionist movement is not something that you can put away and say it is never going to happen in the United States. Time and history change." --2002, Armando Navarro, professor at the University of California-Riverside. "The U.S. Southwest will secede and may rejoin Mexico... No nation's borders have been permanent. Throughout history, nations and empires rise and fall." --2002, Charles Truxillo. professor at the University of New Mexico. (Who also said secession of the U.S. Southwest is an "inevitability" because of continued high Hispanic immigration.) "We don't need no stinking green cards." --Benicio Silva of UC Berkeley declared that having to show them at the border was a "violation of our human rights" because "Aztlan is ours and the white man is the invader." "They say we're 'Latinizing' Los Angeles! Don't you love it? We are fighting to build a new Mestizo nation." "We are here again, we are millions and millions, and the aging white Americans are not making babies, we've got to get ready to govern!" --Jose Angel Gutierrez, long-time University of Texas faculty member Rudy Acuña warns that Chicano youth "bring the possibility of violence" to the Chicano movement, and the "Brown Berets" tell "gringos" that "the streets will run red with the blood of tyrants, who have murdered us for so long." Amnestied and naturalized illegal aliens would be able to vote in U.S. elections. Their extended family members who migrate here also could become future voters in the U.S. "Anchor baby" children born in the U.S. to illegal alien parents also are able to vote. Many Mexican-Americans are patriotic and have no political agenda, but they and their U.S.-born children indeed can be mobilized by Mexico to vote according to Mexico’s interests. Juan Hernandez, U.S.-born member of Vicente Fox’s cabinet, has remarked: "We are betting that the Mexican American population in the United States... will think Mexico first." !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! JUAN HERNANDEZ IS JOHN McAMNESTY McCAIN’S HISPANDERING AGENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ON McCAIN’S PAYROLL!!!!!!! 1. <a href="http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin447.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin447.htm</a> Dr. Corsi also reported the fact that McCain has chosen Juan Hernandez as his Hispanic outreach director. A former Mexican government official, Hernandez is a man who openly advances a "Mexico first" policy everywhere he goes. 1. Corsi wrote, "In an appearance on ABC's Nightline in 2001, Hernandez said, referring to Mexican immigrants in the U.S., 'I want the third generation, the seventh generation, I want them all to think "Mexico first.""' Neither John McCain nor any of his spokesmen have repudiated Hernandez' sentiments. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HILLARY “LA RAZA” CLINTON’S AGENT FOR HISPANDERING IS ANTONIO “TACO RUNT” VILLRAIGOSA, THE RACIST MAYOR OF MEX OCCUPIED LOS ANGELES. CLINTON PROMISED TACO RUNT A CABINET POST IF HE DELIVERED ENOUGH OF THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES! Reference: La Raza -Chicano Activism in California, by Diana Hull, The Social Contract (Summer 1999) ............................. MEMBERS OF THE MEXICAN NAZI PARTY called LA RAZA... “The Race”... Please note that most of these clowns are on you payroll! Servicing the Mexican invasion off your table! And your elected whore is helping them full time! Number 9 is Antonio Villaraigosa, aka “Taco Mex Runt”, mayor of sanctuary city Los Angeles and Hillary Clinton’s campaign co-chairman. Agendas of MEChA, La Raza, MALDEF, and Southwest Voter Registration Projects These are transcripts of live, recorded statements by elected U.S. politicians, college professors, and pro-illegal alien activists whose objective is to take control of our country "by vote if possible and violence if necessary!" 1. Armando Navarro, Prof. Ethnic Studies, UC Riverside at Latino Summit Response to Prop 187, UC Riverside, 1/1995 "These are the critical years for us as a Latino community. We're in a state of transition. And that transformation is called 'the browning of America'. Latinos are now becoming the majority. Because I know that time and history is on the side of the Chicano/Latino community. It is changing in the future and in the present the balance of power of this nation. It's a game - it's a game of power - who controls it. You (to MEChA students) are like the generals that command armies. We're in a state of war. This Proposition 187 is a declaration of war against the Latino/Chicano community of this country. They know the demographics. They know that history and time is on our side. As one community, as one people, as one nation within a nation as the community that we are, the Chicano/Latino community of this nation. What this means is a transfer of power. It means control." 2. Art Torres, former CA state senator, currently Chair of California Democrat Party at UC Riverside 1/1995 "Que viva la causa! It is an honor to be with the new leadership of the Americas, here meeting at UC Riverside. So with 187 on the ballot, what is it going to take for our people to vote - to see us walking into the gas ovens? It is electoral power that is going to make the determination of where we go as a community. And power is not given to you -- you have to take it. Remember: 187 is the last gasp of white America in California. Understand that. And people say to me on the Senate floor when I was in the Senate, 'Why do you fight so hard for affirmative action programs?' And I tell my white colleagues, 'because you're going to need them.'" 3. Jose Angel Gutierrez, Prof. Univ. Texas at Arlington, founder La Raza Unida Party at UC Riverside 1/1995 "The border remains a military zone. We remain a hunted people. Now you think you have a destiny to fulfill in the land that historically has been ours for forty thousand years. And we're a new Mestizo nation. And they want us to discuss civil rights. Civil rights. What law made by white men to oppress all of us of color, female and male. This is our homeland. We cannot - we will not- and we must not be made illegal in our own homeland. We are not immigrants that came from another country to another country. We are migrants, free to travel the length and breadth of the Americas because we belong here. We are millions. We just have to survive. We have an aging white America. They are not making babies. They are dying. It's a matter of time. The explosion is in our population." 5. Mario Obledo, founding member/former national director of Mexican-American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), former CA Secretary Health/Welfare on Tom Leikus radio talk show "We're going to take over all the political institutions in California. In five years the Hispanics are going to be the majority population of this state." Caller: "You also made the statement that California is going to become a Hispanic state and if anyone doesn't like it they should leave - did you say that?" Obledo: "I did. They ought to go back to Europe." 6. Mario Obledo CCIR commentary on Mario Obledo: When CCIR, the California Coalition for Immigration Reform, erected a billboard on the California/Arizona border reading, "WELCOME TO CALIFORNIA, THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION STATE", Mario Obledo, infuriated, went to the billboard location and threatened to blow it up or burn it down. Even after this threat to deny American citizens their freedom of speech, President Clinton awarded Obledo the Presidential Medal of Freedom, America's highest civilian honor. CCIR question to Obledo: "Jose Angel Gutierrez said, 'We have an aging white America, they are dying, I love it.' How would you translate that statement?" Obledo: "He's a good friend of mine. A very smart person." 7. Richard Alatorre, former Los Angeles City Councilman at Latino Summit conference in Los Angeles opposing CA Prop. 209 ending affirmative action in 9/1996 "Because our numbers are growing, they're afraid about this great mass of minorities that now live in our community. They're afraid that we're going to take over the governmental institutions and other institutions. They are right, we will take them over, and we are not going to go away - we are here to stay, and we are saying 'ya basta' (enough!) and we are going to turn... and de... not elect or re-elect people that believe that they are going to advance their political careers on the backs of immigrants and the backs of minorities." 8. Joe Baca, former CA Assemblymember, now Representative, San Bernardino, currently member of Congress at Latino Summit Response to Prop 187 UC Riverside 1/1995 and Southwest Voter Registration Project annual conference in Los Angeles, 6/1996 "We need more Latinos out there. We must stand up and be counted. We must be together, We must be united. Because if we're not united you know what's going to happen? We're like sticks - we're broken to pieces. Divided we're not together. But as a unit they can't break us. So we've got to come together, and if we're united, si se puede (it can be done) and we will make the changes that are necessary. But we've got to do it. We've got to stand together, and dammit, don't let them divide us because that's what they want to do, is to divide us. And once we're divided we're conquered. But when we look out at the audience and we see, you know, la familia, La Raza (the family, our race), you know, it's a great feeling, isn't it a good feeling? And you know, I started to think about that and it reminded me of a book that we all read and we all heard about, you know, Paul Revere, and when he was saying, 'The British are coming, the British are coming!' Well, the Latinos are coming, the Latinos are coming! And the Latinos are going to vote. So our voices will be heard. So that's what this agenda is about. It's about insuring that we increase our numbers. That we increase our numbers at every level. We talk about the Congressional, we talk about the Senate, we talk about board of supervisors, board of education, city councils, commissions, we have got to increase out numbers because the Latinos are coming. Because what's going on right now, with 187, the CCRI (CA Civil Rights Initiative against affirmative action), and let me tell you, we can't go back, you know, we're in a civil war. But we need to be solidified, we need to come together, we must be strong, because united we form a strong body. United we become solidified, united we make a difference, united we make the changes, united Latinos will win throughout California, let's stick together, que si se puede, que no? (it can be done, right?) 9. Antonio Villaraigosa, Chair of MEChA (student wing of Aztlan movement) at UCLA, former CA assemblymember, former CA Assembly speaker, currently Los Angeles City Councilman at Southwest Voter Registration Project Conference in Los Angeles, 6/1997 "Part of today's reality has been propositions like 187 (to deny public benefits to illegal aliens, 1994), propositions like 209 (to abolish affirmative action, 1996), the welfare reform bill, which targeted legal immigrants and targeted us as a community. That's been the midnight. We know that the sunny side of midnight has been the election of a Latino speaker - was the election of Loretta Sanchez, against an arch-conservative, reactionary hate-mongering politician like Congressman Dornan! Today in California in the legislature, we're engaged in a great debate, where not only were we talking about denying education to the children of undocumented workers, but now we're talking about whether or not we should provide prenatal care to undocumented mothers. It's not enough to elect Latino leadership. If they're supporting legislation that denies the undocumented driver's licenses, they don't belong in office, friends. They don't belong here. If they can't stand up and say, 'You know what? I'm not ever going to support a policy that denies prenatal care to the children of undocumented mothers', they don't belong here." 10. Gloria Molina, one of the five in Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors at Southwest Voter Registration Project Conference, 6/1996. Now spokeswoman for La Raza Nazi party. "This community is no longer going to stand for it. Because tonight we are organizing across this country in a single mission, in a plan. We are going to organize like we've never organized before. We are going to go into our neighborhoods. We are going to register voters.” 11. Vicky Castro, former member of Los Angeles Board of Education at Southwest Voter Registration Project Conference, 6/1996 "Que viva la raza, que viva la raza (long live our race)! I'm here to welcome all the new voters of 18 years old that we're registering now in our schools. Welcome, you're going to make a difference for Los Angeles, for San Antonio, for New York, and I thank Southwest for taking that challenge. And to the Mechistas (MEChA students) across this nation, you're going to make that difference for us, too. But when we register one more million voters I will not be the only Latina on the Board of Education of Los Angeles. And let me tell you here, no one will dismantle bilingual education in the United States of America. No one will deny an education to any child, especially Latino children. As you know, in Los Angeles we make up 70% of this school district. Of 600,000 -- 400,000 are Latinos, and our parents are not heard and they're going to be heard because in Los Angeles, San Antonio and Texas we have just classified 53,000 new citizens in one year that are going to be felt in November!" 12. Ruben Zacarias, former superintendent of Los Angeles Unified School District at Southwest Voter Registration Project Conference, 6/1997 "We have 27 centers now throughout LAUSD. Every one of them has trained people, clerks to take the fingerprints. Each one has the camera, that special camera. We have the application forms. And I'll tell you what we've done with I.N.S. Now we're even doing the testing that usually people had to go to INS to take, and pretty soon, hopefully, we'll do the final interviews in our schools. Incidentally, I started this very quietly because there are those that if they knew that we were creating a whole new cadre of brand new citizens it would have tremendous political impact. We will change the political panorama not only of L.A., but L.A. County and the State. And we do that we've changed the panorama of the nation. I'm proud to stand here and tell you that in those close to three years we have processed a little over 78,000 brand new citizens. That is the largest citizenship program in the entire nation." 13. Ernesto Zedillo, former president of Mexico announcing the Mexican constitutional amendment allowing for dual citizenship on 6/23/97 "I have proudly affirmed that the Mexican national extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders, and that Mexican migrants are an important - a very important part of it. For that reason my government proposed a constitutional amendment to allow any Mexican with the right as he desires to acquire another nationality to do so without being forced to first give up his or her Mexican nationality. Fortunately, the amendment was passed almost unanimously by our federal Congress and is now part of our constitution. I am also here today to tell you that we want you to take pride in what each and every one of your Mexican brothers and sisters are doing back home. 14. Augustin Cebada, Information Minister of Brown Berets, militant para-military soldiers of Aztlan shouting at U.S. citizens at an Independence Day rally in Los Angeles, 7/4/96 "Augustin Cebada, Brown Berets, we're here today to show L.A., show the minority people here, the Anglo-Saxons, that we are here, the majority, we're here to stay. We do the work in this city, we take care of the spoiled brat children, we clean their offices, we pick the food, we do the manufacturing in the factories of L.A., we are the majority here and we are not going to be pushed around. We're here in Westwood, this is the fourth time we've been here in the last two months, to show white Anglo-Saxon Protestant L.A., the few of you who remain, that we are the majority, and we claim this land as ours, it's always been ours, and we're still here, and none of the talk about deporting. If anyone's going to be deported it's going to be you! Go back to Simi Valley, you skunks! Go back to Woodland Hills! Go back to Boston! To back to the Plymouth Rock, Pilgrims! Get out! We are the future. You're old and tired. Go on. We have beaten you, leave like beaten rats. You old white people, it is your duty to die. Even their own ethicists say that they should die, that they have a duty to die. They're taking up too much space, too much air. We are the majority in L.A. There's over seven million Mexicans in L.A. County alone. We are the majority. And you're going to see every day more and more of it, as we manifest as our young people grow up, graduate from high school, go on to college and start taking over this society. The vast majority of our people are under the age of 15 years old. Right now we're already controlling those elections, whether it's by violence or nonviolence. Through love of having children we're going to take over." Other demonstrators: "Raza fuerza (brown race power), this is Aztlan, this is Mexico. They're the pilgrims on our land. Go back to the Nina, the Pinta, the Santa Maria." 19. MEChA (student wing of the Aztlan movement) - motto: "For the race, everything, for those outside the race, nothing." - Chants at national conference, Cal State Univ., Northridge, 6/1996 "Viva la raza (long live our race)", "Chicano power" "We didn't cross the border, the border crossed us" "Long live the revolution" "Esta es mi tierra, esta es mi lucha (This is my land, this is my fight)" The above transcripts are from audio clips ................. ]]>

<![CDATA[While our elected work hard for their corporate paymasters, demanding open borders, no wall, mucho welfare for illegals, small town America, from border to border are fighting the Mexican invasion and occpuation. WHEN NarcoMex starts their own Mexican welfare system, other than shipping them over our borders, we will find: WAGES FOR STUPID GRINGOS NO LONGER DEPRESSED TAXES FOR MEX WELFARE GO DOWN MEXICAN GANGS DISAPPEAR MEXICAN DRUG CARTEL FINDS SOMETHING ELSE TO DO OTHER THAN LOPPING OFF HEADS THE BORDERS ARE SECURED 12 AMERICANS THAT WOULD BE MURDERED BY ILLEGALS EVERYDAY WOULD STILL BE ALIVE. EMAIL THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Brown Berets de Aztlan are recruiting and forming new chapters 1. Ernesto Cienfuegos La Voz de Aztlan Los Angeles, Alta California - May 1, 2008 - (ACN) "The Brown Berets de Aztlan have undertaken an active campaign to recruit more soldiers and form new chapters throughout Aztlan," said Chairman David Rico yesterday. "We will be having a series of presentations throughout the Southwest starting in San Diego on May 8, 2008," he added. David Rico is one of the original founders of the Brown Berets in California and was one of the Brown Beret soldiers that seized and took over land in Barrio Logan in San Diego that later became, the now world famous, "Chicano Park". In the first presentation in San Diego, David Rico and other Brown Berets will be speaking on what it takes to be a Brown Beret de Aztlan, what the organization believes in and on future plans. They will also be answering questions. The first presentation is scheduled for May 8, 2008 from 6:30-9:00 p.m. at the Centro Cultural de La Raza located in Balboa Park at 2125 Park Blvd, San Diego. After the recruitment campaign, the Brown Berets de Aztlan will be organizing caravans to the state of Arizona where our community is presently under siege by racists and other anti-immigrant elements. <a href="http://www.aztlan.net/brown_berets_de_aztlan.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.aztlan.net/brown_berets_de_aztlan.htm</a> ..................................... Lou Dobbs Tonight Monday, February 11, 2008 In California, League of United Latin American Citizens has adopted a resolution to declare "California Del Norte" a sanctuary zone for immigrants. The declaration urges the Mexican government to invoke its rights under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo "to seek third-nation neutral arbitration of ....disputes concerning immigration laws and their enforcement." We’ll have the story. Mexican President Felipe Calderon is in New York today on the first leg his five-day tour across America to meddle in immigration issues in the United States. This is his first visit to the U.S. since he became President in 2006, but he will not meet with President Bush or any of the presidential candidates, who he has accused of spewing anti-immigrant rhetoric. Join us for that report. ............................. AMERICAN TAXPAYERS BEING FORCED TO SUPPORT LATINO NAZI PARTY (since this was published, Harry Reid of La Raza occupied Nevada, went to Congress an got $5 million more for La Raza and each presidential candidate has embraced and sold out to La Raza for the illegals’ illegal votes!) By Dave Gibson (09/17/2006) <a href="http://americandaily.com/article/15577" rel="nofollow">http://americandaily.com/article/15577</a> In 2005, the Latino group known as La Raza (The Race) was given $15.2 million in U.S. federal grants. La Raza also received an additional $4 million in so-called 'earmarks' tucked into the 2005 Housing Bill, which our Congress passed and President Bush signed. Considering the racist agenda of La Raza, giving federal funds to this group is tantamount to the U.S. funding the Nazis in the 1930's. The comparison to the Nazi Party is well deserved. La Raza openly supports pushing all but Latino Americans out of a portion of the United States (ethnic cleansing), they call for 'Reconquista' or the re-conquest of the American Southwest by Mexico (the re-occupation of the Sudetanland), and the establishment of 'Atzlan' which is the utopian all-Latino version of the American Southwestern states (Adolf Hitler planned to called his utopia Germania). Karl Rove was one of the keynote speakers at this year's annual National Council of La Raza Conference. The event was held in Los Angeles (the eventual capital of Atzlan). Other speakers included Jesse Jackson, Bill Clinton, and the virulent racist L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. The fact that Karl Rove is the President's top political adviser and addressed the group with Bush's blessing, is a strong indicator that this nation is being subverted at the very highest levels. If La Raza was a white supremacist group with equally deep pockets, the U.S. government would place them on a terrorist watch list, infiltrate them with undercover FBI agents, and subject them to constant harassment by the Internal Revenue Service. Eventually, the group's leaders would be jailed and the group itself would be rendered irrelevant. However, because La Raza is a Latino supremacist group, the Bush administration and most of Congress offer them financial support! “THE RACIST GOALS OF THAT ORGANIZATION,” SENATOR HARRY REID, MEXICAN ASS LICKER! One of La Raza's biggest supporters is Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV). In 2001, Reid asked the Senate Appropriations Committee for $5 million to help further the racist goals of that organization. That same year, La Raza gave Sen. Reid their Capital Award for "his commitment to advance legislation priorities of the Latino community." Reid in turn praised La Raza by saying: "La Raza is like the biblical David, fighting all these Goliaths." Taxpayer funds are also funneled to La Raza through the Department of Health and Human Services, The Environmental Protection Agency, and even NASA. Tax dollars are hidden in these government agencies, earmarked to be specifically given away to La Raza. Inside the halls of Congress, the practice is known as discretionary funding...In the real world it is known as money laundering! In 2005, $7.9 million was stolen from the American taxpayers and given out to Latino-only charter schools in the form of U.S. Department of Education grants. The following is a list of a few of those schools: -La Academia Semillas del Pueblo (Los Angeles) -Atzlan Academy (Tucson, AZ) -Mexicayotl Academy (Nogales, AZ) -The Dolores Huerta Prepatory High School (Pueblo, CO) -Academia Cesar Chavez Charter School (St. Paul, MN) These schools stress Latino culture, the Spanish language, the reconquest of the American Southwest, ethnic cleansing and the establishment of the mythical Atzlan, and even Aztec math!...Again, all taught on your dime! According to the Capital Research Center, La Raza has assets well in excess of $50 million. This same group reports that La Raza spends about $1 million annually on lobbying and fundraising. Can you imagine a high-ranking member of the Roosevelt administration making a trip to Berlin to show support for the Nazi Party? Or perhaps the Congress appropriating money to the Ku Klux Klan? While those scenarios both sound absurd, the support that our elected officials are giving to the racist group known as La Raza is no different. One has to wonder, if the KKK offered extremely cheap labor to unscrupulous American businesses and potential votes to equally unscrupulous politicians...Would Congress fund whites-only charter schools? ...................................... MEChA-the Mexican Nazi Movement <a href="http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/14851.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/14851.html</a> MEChA (“Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan” or Chicano Students Movement of Aztlan) is neither a fraternity nor a “good-natured and altruistic college campus organization”. Rather, it is the Hispanic version of the Nazis, Ku Klux Klan or Islamic Jihad—take your pick or mix ‘n match. MEChA’s news organ La Voz de Aztlan (“the voice of Aztlan”) regularly and consistently prints opinions and “news” stories that vilify Israel and Jews, in general. Amongst others, one of its staff writers-Ernesto Cienfuegos-has written numerous anti-Semitic articles including but, not limited to “Jews against Islam: The War of Cartoons”, “Jewish Maquiladora Owners Scam Tijuana Workers”, “The Kosher Nostra Scam on the American Consumer”, “Zionist Plot to take over Mexican Presidency” and “Jewish Rabbi gives three infants Herpes”. WHEW! The site also blasts Los Angeles KFI talk-show host Bill Handel in its statement: “The radio show is hosted by a Jew named Bill Handel who has a history of making obscene and racist remarks against non-Jewish ethnic, racial and religious groups including Mexicans.” Another of its “news” stories includes “Anti-Mexican Jewish Bigot Identified” in which it states: “The racist Jew who filmed a video in which he humiliates a group of Mexican workers (Jornaleros) has been identified. La Voz de Aztlan has received information on the hateful Jew who produced the shameful video. This is more proof that these sinister, malevolent, malicious and nefarious people will stop at nothing.” The site also firmly aligns itself with Islam. If one is looking for good old-fashioned no-holds-barred “hate speech against Jews”, La Voz de Aztlan is the site to visit. But, the Aztlan Movement is much more than just a small and inconsequential “hate-Jew movement”—much more, indeed. On its site, La Voz announced its participation in the 2004 "Forum on Binational Thought" which was held in Mexico City. The speaker from the Aztlan Movement was named as no other than Henry Cisneros! La Voz writes: “From Aztlan, Henry Cisneros will deliver the speech "Future of the relationship between Mexican and Mexican-Americans". Cisneros was Bill Clinton's Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and is presently a John Kerry campaign aide within the Mexican-American community.” And if that doesn’t curl your hair, current California Lieutenant Governor Cruz Bustamante and Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa are “former” MEChA members. But, one has to wonder if the “former” designation is accurate. Note: This definitely takes MEChA and the Aztlan Movement out of the “fringe” category and places it into the mainstream Hispanic Democrat camp. And it is patently chilling. Most certainly, MEChA’s Aztlan Movement does not represent the majority of Hispanics in the United States. The mere fact that lawmakers in the US are members (or claim to be “former” members) should at least give all US citizens pause—if not creating a call to action. This hate-filled organization is growing, folks—and so is its influence on other US lawmakers. Bear in mind, MEChA’s Aztlan Movement is also the organization that is working for the Reconquista (“reconquest”) of the US’ Southwestern states, which include California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas. And with increasing backing from US “leaders”, including a US Senate that appears to be feckless in passing any Immigration Reform bill that has real teeth and viability, they just might affect it. However, this time the New Nazi movement won’t have a German accent. Comprende usted? <a href="http://www.aztlan.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.aztlan.net/</a> <a href="http://www.aztlan.net/jew_bill_handel.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.aztlan.net/jew_bill_handel.htm</a> <a href="http://www.aztlan.net/binational_thought.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.aztlan.net/binational_thought.htm</a> <a href="http://www.americanpatrol.com/MECHA/makingofbustamante991030.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanpatrol.com/MECHA/makingofbustamante991030.html</a> <a href="http://www.aztlan.net/jewish_bigot_identified.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.aztlan.net/jewish_bigot_identified.htm</a> See: CFR’s Plan to Integrate the U.S., Mexico and Canada <a href="http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20050816.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20050816.htm</a> The Great Alien Invasion - What's Happening Now <a href="http://www.rense.com/general69/inva.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.rense.com/general69/inva.htm</a> "Bush Secret Border Wars" Mayhem and terror in Southern states to protect government drug cartels <a href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2005/140805borderwars.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2005/140805borderwars.htm</a> Mexican/Bush Crime Families Expand in U.S. <a href="http://www.sianews.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2652" rel="nofollow">http://www.sianews.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2652</a> <a href="http://immigrationcounters.com/" rel="nofollow">http://immigrationcounters.com/</a> <a href="http://usaborderalert.com/" rel="nofollow">http://usaborderalert.com/</a> ***************************************************************************** ]]>

<![CDATA[So, you're saying that it was George W. Bush who came up with Adjustable Rate Mortgages, Reverse Mortgages, etc.? You're saying it's George W. Bush who convinced people to live beyond their means and buy more house than they could afford? You're saying it's GWB who made people charge several credit cards to the max and then attempt to pay them off making minimum payments? Thanks for the info. You must be one of those typical, crybaby democRATS who think that the government should take care of them instead of the other way around. You point the finger in blame at everyone but yourself and then walk around with your hand out expecting to get something for nothing. Are you one of those fools who listened to jack-asses like your parents when they told you to go to school, get good grades and get a good job? That lie doesn't work does it? Did you know that you live in a free enterprise society? Or are you stupid enough to work for someone else and then sign your paycheck on the back? Grow up and make your own way in life. You trailer trash welfare baby.]]>

<![CDATA[Who is your "candidate"?? Do you even have one or is that your weenie way of saying you can't make a decision? How will McCain do "less damage" to our country? Explain. We all know you are biased against Obama, no need to do your silly name-calling game. Justify yourself.]]>

<![CDATA["How about your candidate? Post some of the excellent attributes we should study and understand. Tell us why your candidate is the best choice. We want to hear and see a positive, truthful and constructive rationale as to why you believe voting for your choice is best." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- My candidate isn't running. Just because I point out "what is wrong" with your candidate doesn't mean I'm endorsing John McCain. John McCain doesn't represent me. The only thing I like about him is that he won't wave the white flag and surrender to our enemy on every front like the Democrats will. The only rationale I have for voting for McCain is he, once again, is the lesser of two evils. I have a choice. Either vote for a Liberal Republican who has one or two attributes that I prefer or vote for a far left, extreme, radical, terrorist sympathizing and supporting, ultra liberal Democrat that represents everything that I stand against. As a Conservative I have no choice but to vote for the candidate that would do less damage to the country. And unfortunately, that's McCain. And that is why I continue to make the case that Barack Hussein Obama is the most liberal and dangerous candidate for President of the U.S. that we have ever seen in the history of this country.]]>

<![CDATA[ So far you have posted what is "wrong" with the Democratic candidate(s). How about your candidate? Post some of the excellent attributes we should study and understand. Tell us why your candidate is the best choice. We want to hear and see a positive, truthful and constructive rationale as to why you believe voting for your choice is best. ]]>

<![CDATA[A television news segment produced by Al-Jazeera shows Palestinians in Gaza engaging in phone banking activities for Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama. The segment explains how young Palestinians have banded together to call American voters at random asking them to vote for Obama. Gaza's Obama campaign video here: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21YF7ggCG6g" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21YF7ggCG6g</a> Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Qaeda, Hugo Chavez, Raul Castro, all supporting Hussein Obama. Too bad Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini or Pol Pot weren't still alive today. You Libs could nominate one of them. I can see it now. Hermann Göring setting up a phone bank calling Americans and encouraging them to vote for Hitler to become the Democratic President of the United States of America. Man, you Libs sure know how to pick a candidate! ]]>

<![CDATA[Bin Laden's Jihad has some goals that the republican leadership doesn't want you to know about: 1. Increase the price of oil substantially to bring more money to the Middle East 2. Disrupt the American Economy 3. Cause chaos in Wall Street Trading 4. Devalue the American Dollar 5. Promote infighting among all Americans 6. Move the USA out of the world leadership position Under our present leadership, it would appear that the terrorists are doing a fine job of accomplishing these goals, quite possibly being enabled by that republican leadership. The secrecy surrounding the Bush administration has much to do with covering that fact. Mr. >>===>'s accusation of "guilt" follows in line with the denial and propaganda from that same administration. It is not guilt that the Democratic leaders are speaking from; it is direct criticism of the incompetence of this republican administration led by Mr. Bush. Those who think as >>===> are finding themselves obsolete and inconsequential to the survival of the United States. They will continue to squeak in protest; those squeaks and cries are of the fools concerned about nothing but their own selfish goals.]]>

<![CDATA[At LONG last, has this fucking idiot no sense of propriety, no sense of shame? Rhetorical question... President Bush Committed Political Treason Today By Will Bunch I've seen a lot of sad things in American politics in my lifetime - the resignation of a president who became a national disgrace after he oversaw a campaign of break-ins and cover-ups, another who circumvented the Constitution to trade arms for hostages, and yet is now hailed as national hero. And those paled to what we have seen in the last seven years - flagrant disregard for the Constitution, the launching of a "pre-emptive" war on false pretenses, and discussions about torture and other shocking abuses inside the White House inner sanctum. But now it's come to this: A new low that I never imagined was even possible. President Bush went on foreign soil today, and committed what I consider an act of political treason: Comparing the candidate of the U.S. opposition party to appeasers of Nazi Germany - in the very nation that was carved out from the horrific calamity of the Holocaust. Bush's bizarre and beyond-appropriate detour into American presidential politics took place in the middle of what should have been an occasion for joy: A speech to Israeli's Knesset to honor that nation's 60th birthday. But here's what he said: JERUSALEM (CNN) – In a particularly sharp blast from halfway around the world, President Bush suggested Thursday that Sen. Barack Obama and other Democrats are in favor of "appeasement" of terrorists in the same way U.S. leaders appeased Nazis in the run-up to World War II. "Some seem to believe we should negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along," said Bush, in what White House aides privately acknowledged was a reference to calls by Obama and other Democrats for the U.S. president to sit down for talks with leaders like Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. "We have heard this foolish delusion before," Bush said in remarks to the Israeli Knesset. "As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American Senator declared: 'Lord, if only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided.' We have an obligation to call this what it is - the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history." As a believer in free speech, I think Bush has a right to say what he wants, but as a President of the United States who swore to uphold the Constitution, his freedom also carries an awesome and solemn responsibility, and what this president said today is a serious breach of that high moral standard. Of course, there are differences of opinion on how America should handle Iran, and that's why we're having an election here at home, to sort these issues out - hopefully with respect and not with emotional and inaccurate appeals. Not only is the president's comment a gross misrepresentation of Barack Obama's stance on the issue, but ironically, it comes just a day after his own Secretary of State, Robert Gates, said of Iran: "We need to figure out a way to develop some leverage ... and then sit down and talk with them." Is Gates a Nazi appeaser-type, too? And Bush has been hardly consistent on this point, either. Look at his own dealings with oil-rich Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi, linked to deadly terror attacks like Pan Am Flight 103. But what Bush did in Israel this morning goes well beyond the accepted confines of American political debate, When the president speaks to a foreign parliament on behalf of our country, his message needs to be clear and unambiguous. Our democracy may look messy to outsiders, and we may have our disagreements with some sharp elbows thrown around, but at the end of the day we are not Republicans or Democrats or liberals or conservatives. We are Americans. And you, Mr. Bush, are the leader of us all. To use a diplomatic setting on foreign soil to score a cheap political point at home is way beneath your office, way beneath your country, and way beneath the people you serve. You have been handed an office once uplifted to great heights by fellow countrymen from Washington to Lincoln to Roosevelt to Eisenhower, and have plunged it so deeply into the Karl-Rove-and-Rush-Limbaugh-fueled world of political destruction and survival of all costs that have lost all perspective - and all sense of decency. To travel to Israel and to associate a sitting American senator and your possible successor in the Oval Office with those who at one time gave comfort to an enemy of the United States is, in and of itself, an act of political treason. In another irony, this comes from an administration that has already committed such grave abuses that its former officials are becoming fearful of traveling overseas, lest they be arrested for war crimes. Despite the alleged crimes and misdemeanors of the Bush administration, the Democrats who control the House have until now been restrained in their use of the impeachment process, hoping that the final eight months of our American nightmare can pass by quickly. Indeed, one has to wonder how much of Bush's outrageous statement this morning arose from fear - fear that a President Obama will go after his wrongdoing in 2009. Today, it's a whole new ballgame. I believe this treacherous statement by a U.S. president in Israel is a signal to the Democrats in the House in Washington, that it's time to play its Constitutional role in ending this trauma, before even greater acts against the interest of America are wrongly committed in our name.]]>

<![CDATA[Thanks for all the foreclosures, Bush! I'm gonna make a killing this year! What's got Bernanke scared is that "about one quarter of subprime adjustable-rate mortgages are currently 90 days or more delinquent or in foreclosure. That's 25%, folks. ]]>

<![CDATA[The Taliban offered to hand Bin Laden over to a THIRD country, one that would "never come under pressuse of the US" . Bush said no thanks, there would be NO negotiations to our demands. "Hand over Bin Laden for prosecution". There was NEVER an offer to hand Bin Laden over to Bush. I'd give you the benefit of the doubt, EXCEPT that you always seem to make remarks that are either not all there, or totally in error. It amazes me how libs will pick and chose lines totally out of context to try to prove a point that wasn't there to begin with. ]]>

<![CDATA["We do know for sure that after 9/11 the Taliban offered to turn OBL over to a neutral third-party country, if not the US, and the idea was pooh-pooh-ed by Bush". Mr dumb ass, your statement above is pure hogwash and absolutely unfounded. Amazing you libs believe everything as long as it's about Bush. You are just an idiot. Really, you have the nerve to talk about conservatives making shit up????]]>

<![CDATA[You tell us we "know for a fact". Prove your statement please. I have thoroughly researched Bin Laden and his history, and have NEVER seen that claim in print. Of course, I don't frequent the tin foil hat sites either. Prove your statement.]]>

<![CDATA[First off, there's a difference between standing by your convictions and being batshit crazy. President Bush doesn't budge because he knows he's right, in his heart. that may not make sense to a moral relativist like yourself, but that's what it is. islamic extremists are evil, at their core. The reason we cannot negotaite with them, without conditions, is one part culture,. and two parts blatant mistrust. Culturally, Muslims respect force. but only if their foe is willing to USE it, not spit out meaningless sanctions. two, and the point I had stuck to earlier, these people will lie to get ahead. they will break promises. what the fuck are we supposed to do, lafayette, vote for them, too? they chose their leaders, and we have to work with them. one notes that we are willing to negotiate with Al-Sadr because we've basically marginilized him to obsolescence. How...give you a hint: starts with an M. ends with an S. the domestic oil supply we have will last us for years, dummy. we need to drill here, now, not later. and that also means drilling ANWR. It may not be cheaper now, but I agree that the sauds can't be trusted. if we want to depress their leverage, we're going to have to get real. not the strategic oil reserve, that's stupid. think a little! Finally, guess what, stupid? Carter's been best buds with chavez and Castro. I'm right, get over it. and something else you need to realize; those islamic extremists don't really pick themselves by nationality. mostly by religious sect. most of these people loath the idea because these nations were created by the british empire. Part of the islamic takeover is the dissolving of these nations into a unified islamic state. I think if Iran attacked us Obama would attack Syria because it would be obvious to everyone that Syria is behind it. Maybe he would raise the enlistment age to 55. WHAT??? are you serious? really. is that, the best you've got??? please don't run for office. please. you're delusional tendencies are troubling. ]]>

<![CDATA[Like I said in the posting. President Bush never mentioned Hussein Obama by name. Democrats obviously have psychological guilt resulting in their weakness and appeasement regarding foreign policy when it comes to dealing with terrorism and terrorists. I find it interesting the hypocrisy on the left when it comes to the accusation of treason. Democrats have been trashing the President and the country on foreign soil for 7 years now and these sycophantic Liberals revel in it. They love when Pelosi or Kerry undermine the war and call President Bush Hitler at a press conference in Paris, but when President Bush states that "some", not mentioning anyone by name, "seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals", the Liberals conclude that as an implication of Hussein Obama. And to them that implication is a direct accusation and in turn makes the President a traitor. The only way Liberals could make that leap is from guilt. Period! Don't get angry Lib, accept it.]]>

<![CDATA[We do know for sure that after 9/11 the Taliban offered to turn OBL over to a neutral third-party country, if not the US, and the idea was pooh-pooh-ed by Bush. He probably realized that if bin Laden were still on the loose, he could invoke his name to instill fear in the citizens of the USA, and thereby make it easier to attack Iraq, which he had intended to do before 9/11 anyway. And he's still using bin Laden for that propose. A perfect symbiotic relationship. George Bush and Osama bin Laden, partners in creating a new world by destroying an old one.]]>

<![CDATA[Yeah, and I suppose all the Clinton loving liberals have ignore the fact that the Commission made it VERY CLEAR that they were there to ONLY investigate the actual 9/11 attack, and NOT events leading up to it in CLinton's administration. Try another post...your last one didn't work out too well. If you would care to actually research all remarks made, then you would also find frustration and exasperation at the SAME Commission for NOT looking into those events earlier on. As usual, Bill got another free pass. Face it....Bill fucked up, and you just can't admit it. It's OK actually, to admit mistakes. No President has EVER gone through two terms without making many mistakes. Other Presidents have made mistakes, and have looked back and admitted them, but when it comes to Bill, not only does HE hate to admit it, but you faithful to him hate to admit it. In fact, you absolutely refuse to admit ANY of his errors. That's one good reason his wife is losing right now. Failure to be truthful.]]>

<![CDATA[Yeah, right. Bush wasn't talking about Obama. Too bad some members of our government and their supports are so fucking stupid they believe everything they are told about the war and therefore support it without question. These retarded dumb fucks have no common sense which is why they cannot stop supporting political polices that do not work, such as; supply side economics, science, and the separation of church and state. I wonder who I'm talking about?]]>

<![CDATA[You know and understand nothing ! ]]>

<![CDATA[ Yeah, you libs always speak the truth. the truth is, there are some people you cannot reach, and you cannot negotiate with. It’s impossible to negotiate with Bush so he’s a terrorist right? And for speaking the truth, Mr. Bush seems to have a serious flaw when telling truth, he never does. President Bush was exactly right; you can't talk to people like Hamas, PIJ, Al qaeda, or the nation of Iran. I don't think that makes sense. these people are rabidly posessed by some evil notion that they are destined to take over the world. First. President Bush hasn’t been right on anything since he took office; not right on how to handle the war, not right on how to handle the economy, not right on what the America citizens want, not right on anything. Second, were does this irrational fear come from? You fear these people so much you would rather blow them up without even trying to talk to them. I suppose you want Russia to have the same thought process as you? You think anyone with a nuclear bomb should just blow up people that don’t want to talk them? Do you see how irrational your thought process is? History teaches us, that terrorists, particularly radical islamists, are willing to lie. their promises, much like the soviets, are flexible. they can be broken. the fact that Obama is willing to sit down and take a madman like Ahmadinejad on his face is dangerous. it speaks volumes to his inexperience. Doesn’t this last statement sound a lot like Bush? He promised Democracy in Iraq but settled for a Theocracy. He promised that war would pay for itself. The fact that Bush is willing to sit down with Russian leaders should scare but it doesn’t because Bush is exempt from your twisted logic. we can hope to contain Iran, but as long as we're dependent on arab oil, and not willing to exploit our own reserves, they have us at their discretion. the fact that even Obama can acknowledge Iran's nuclear ambitions and still want to talk his way out of a confrontation without conditions is not only delusional, but it floors me people can vote for this idiot. Our reserves are not the answer and you know it. It would be at best a temporary fix for a few months. And don’t start on all the oil found in shall rock. That’s an expensive way to get oil and again, not the answer to our problem. How you can be surprised about any voting for Obama when you were part of the group that voted Bush into office. I seriously question your judgment and your ability to judge others. Carter's own enthusiasm for anybody who hates America troubles me. it's bad enough that people openly decry our military as a group of drug-addled hooligans, but to see an ex-president walking hand in hand with scum like that makes me wonder why we're still a free country. This is a typical Republican politrick; make a ridiculous false statement as if it was true. I guess you’re just as outraged at the pictures of Bush literally walking hand in hand with the king Saudi Arabia, the country where most of the 911 hijackers came from.? What would Barry Hussein do if we get attacked by these people? indeed, that's one question I don't want answered I think if Iran attacked us Obama would attack Syria because it would be obvious to everyone that Syria is behind it. Maybe he would raise the enlistment age to 55. ]]>

<![CDATA[In a speech to Israel's Knesset, President Bush said: "Some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along. "We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: 'Lord, if I could only have talked to Hitler, all this might have been avoided.' We have an obligation to call this what it is—the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history." ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Democrats, including, Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, Joseph Biden, Hillary Clinton and Hussein Obama immediately went on the defensive. Hussein Obama accused President Bush on of launching a "false political attack" accusing him of appeasing terrorists and radicals. Hussein Obama said; "It is sad that President Bush would use a speech to the Knesset on the 60th anniversary of Israel's independence to launch a false political attack," Obama said in the statement his aides distributed. "George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists, and the president's extraordinary politicization of foreign policy and the politics of fear do nothing to secure the American people or our stalwart ally Israel." ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Never did President Bush mention Hussein Obama by name or the Democrats, even though Hussein Obama has gone on record saying that he would meet with the leaders of terrorists states including Iran and Cuba, without preconditions. It seems to me to be a case of weakness and guilt on the Democrats' part. But what more would we expect from appeasing Liberals? ]]>

<![CDATA[I think I have finally found an education system that is worse than the teacher's union public schools that they have destroyed in this country. Of course I'm speaking about the wackos blowing themselves and as many people nearby, as possible, in Iraq. A couple months ago, Al-Qeada used a couple teenagers with Down's Syndrome as suicide bombers. We suspect that these poor retarded children didn't even know they were strapped with bombs. So last week, they used a 16 year old as a suicide bomber and yesterday, a 12 year old. Just what in the name of God are they telling these children? Unbelievable. Finally a school system worse than ours. Of course, being Mr Silver Lining, at least their twisted products, that is the suicide bombers, do their damage relatively quickly and than they're gone. The products of our school system continue to wreak havoc for 40-50 years before their heads explode one night watching Herr Obermann. But hey, don't worry, Islam is the religion of peace. Or is that pieces?? ]]>

<![CDATA[OBAMA SAYS FL & MI CAN VOTE, BUT ONLY IF THE VOTES DON'T COUNT. IT LOOKS LIKE HE REALLY IS SADDAM'S COUSIN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Former Senator Tom Daschle, a supporter of Obama told CNN’s Gloria Borger that Obama would like to “give Florida the opportunity to vote” – but not in a way that would change the overall outcome. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Same line Obama supporter Chaka Fattah said on "Hardball" the other day. Count the votes, but only if they don't really count. . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Not counting Florida and Michigan into the nominating process makes the nominee illegitimate. Just like Bush and his stolen win. Can't say it any plainer than that.]]>

<![CDATA[From Der Spiegel: The American public has not only been misled during this election campaign, but has also been fed a constant stream of irrelevant information. In one of his novels, the British writer, essayist and journalist George Orwell invented the Ministry of Truths, which he called "minitruths," with which one would try to confuse the public with small parts of the truth that even when added up do not give the whole picture. A journalist's twin points of references should be the real and the important. But for months the focus of the election coverage was on trivia. Every insignificant detail got blown out of proportion, with every chipmunk becoming a Godzilla. According to a report by the Project for Excellence in Journalism, over 60 percent of election coverage by the US media has been focused on campaign strategies, tactics or personalities -- but not on actual political content. Reporters focused the most attention on such pressing questions as whether Barack Obama was wearing an American flag lapel pin, whether John McCain had a mistress eight years ago or whether former first lady Hillary Clinton was incorrectly recalling her 1996 trip to Bosnia. Clinton claimed to recall hearing sniper fire as her plane landed in Bosnia. In fact, as archive TV footage later showed, Clinton was actually greeted by a young girl who recited a poem on the tarmac. That may have been embarrassing for Hillary Clinton, but it is insignificant for voters. Even the eccentric pastor from Obama's church, Jeremiah Wright, is not worth the fuss. "God damn America," he preached. So what? The priest at my Catholic church was a reactionary, while my class teacher was a communist. Perhaps the mad and the blind to the right and the left of our path through life are there simply to show us where the middle way is. Via <a href="http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/85463/" rel="nofollow">Alternet</a>]]>

<![CDATA[From the NYT, among many other sources: "Critics of the Clinton administration have accused it of ignoring the threat posed by Mr. bin Laden in the mid-1990's while he was still in Sudan, and they point to claims by some Sudanese officials that they offered to turn him over to the Americans before ultimately expelling him in 1996 under international pressure. But Clinton administration diplomats have adamantly denied that they received such an offer, and the Sept. 11 commission concluded in one of its staff reports that it had "not found any reliable evidence to support the Sudanese claim." Now, I'm quite sure the Clinton-hating-at-all-costs RWKDs (Right Wing Kool-Aid Drinking) cockroaches will pooh-pooh the Times and dismiss out of hand the BIPARTISAN 9/11 Commission, but hey, what else can we expect by those so frightened of the truth, all they can do is make ad hominem attacks against those turning on the lights? Poor darlings, it's all they've got left of their crumbling empire...emphasis on 'empire.']]>

<![CDATA[Get a grip. You are the most hate filled individual on this board. You make me sick. It is not just smokers to blame for all of the ills in this country. Hell automobile accidents kill, drinking kills, people kill, drugs kill, doctors kill, food kills. I mean really should we just ban living altogether??? We have all kinds of vices and habits in our lives. I pay taxes just like most people, yet I don't feel the need to judge anyone else, I will leave that to you tolerant democrats. With attitudes like yours, it is not even remotely possible to reconcile the division in this country.]]>

<![CDATA[You are free to hold your breath and stomp your foot like a petulant child. You are also free to dispute any facts, NNL. In fact, I dare you, tough guy! Let's hear what Keith Hussein Olbermann was wrong about!]]>

<![CDATA[SHHHH! Don't let the democRATS know about this or they'll start protesting against it. They will want the money going toward educating our military to go to planned parenthood so that they can murder s'more unborn babies.]]>

<![CDATA[Just because you say the report has been discredited. Just because you say it's a lie, does not make it so. If you would do your homework, rather than make off the cuff statements, you would find that the report is true. But since you were second in line to give bubba a blowjob, you don't wanna hear anything negative about the candy-ass murderer.]]>

<![CDATA[The Sudanese story has been discredited. It's a lie.]]>

<![CDATA[For all full time active military. Free college courses while enrolled active duty. Saves up to $60K. Call right now for start dates. www.devry.edu For more information call: David 303.280.7657]]>

<![CDATA[That would be ok, except that they're taking the rest of us over with them. HAHA! You're the funny one, nevernever.... and your name explains it. Continue your oblivious following of the Bush leadership, and we'll watch you tumble over the cliff with the rest of the lemmings. ]]>

<![CDATA[That is the problem. We get to pay for your prolonged expensive death. there is no way you can have enough money and when push comes to shove you will try to weasel the care out of the hospitals or the state or feds. Get life !!! moron! ]]>

<![CDATA[HAHA! You're the funny one, nevernever.... and your name explains it. Continue your oblivious following of the Bush leadership, and we'll watch you tumble over the cliff with the rest of the lemmings. ]]>

<![CDATA[Those who fear will cover the truth, and flagging that post is precisely that type of coverup. If there was nothing to fear, they would disregard the post and the Olberman commentary. Knowing it is true, they will flag. The tactics of this administration and their followers and worshipers is becoming more apparent every day, and it isn't pretty. Those who continue to defend this destruction of our country and economy have the right to do so, but they are as effective as bleating sheep. Anyone who begins his/her rant with "you liberals" and demonstrates such arrogance as "Liberals call ME a liar??" makes obvious who they have been listening to. Beside the facts that broadcaster is an illegal user of prescription drugs, has been used as a propaganda machine, has falsely dominated the market by manipulation, attempted to incite treasonous behavior, and has been proven to having told outright lies repeatedly, his audience is declining in spite of every effort to keep competition from broadcasting in his time slot and outlets. The sheep in this crowd are those that are afraid to speak against the current administration. Free speech is not SELECTED free speech. ]]>

<![CDATA[Truth to power, what a laugh! Herr Obermann is your typical, hair on fire, lunatic, liberal, raving idiot. Only a true believer could sit there with a straight face watching him. His "Mr" Bush sthick is sooo yesterday. But I love it, put him front and center boys, show us all what the face of hate and fear mongering looks like. If someone flagged it, they should be ashamed. Not only because this is a forum for Pete's sake, but I want this rubbish out there for every one to see. Truth to power, ohmygod, are you a holdover from the 60s or are you 14 and grooving? Do you raise your fist when Obermann is channelling into you? What a scream. ]]>

<![CDATA[<a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/05/14/countdown-special-comment-to-president-bush-shut-the-hell-up/" rel="nofollow">http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/05/14/countdown-special-comment-to-president-bush-shut-the-hell-up/</a>]]>

<![CDATA[Yeah, you libs always speak the truth. the truth is, there are some people you cannot reach, and you cannot negotiate with. President Bush was exactly right; you can't talk to people like Hamas, PIJ, Al qaeda, or the nation of Iran. I don't think that makes sense. these people are rabidly posessed by some evil notion that they are destined to take over the world. History teaches us, that terrorists, particularly radical islamists, are willing to lie. their promises, much like the soviets, are flexible. they can be broken. the fact that Obama is willing to sit down and take a madman like Ahmadinejad on his face is dangerous. it speaks volumes to his inexperience. we can hope to contain Iran, but as long as we're dependent on arab oil, and not willing to exploit our own reserves, they have us at their discretion. the fact that even Obama can acknowledge Iran's nuclear ambitions and still want to talk his way out of a confrontation without conditions is not only delusional, but it floors me people can vote for this idiot. Carter's own enthusiasm for anybody who hates America troubles me. it's bad enough that people openly decry our military as a group of drug-addled hooligans, but to see an ex-president walking hand in hand with scum like that makes me wonder why we're still a free country. What would Barry Hussein do if we get attacked by these people? indeed, that's one question I don't want answered]]>

<![CDATA[Ya gotta cut the cowards some slack: Repubs, especially in this room, have nothing else to do, except flag truth. They're morally, spiritually, and politically bankrupt; they are the 21% who'll defend Bush even if Bush HIMSELF said all that Olbermann is, and has said; they can do no other than to bury their heads in silly ass flagging. The truth of the matter is, Bush is undefendable. I'll help ya! Let me know when your post gets flagged, and I'll repost it! know watching this much truth takes a little more courage than the typical cowardly, treasonous Republican can muster, but here's Keith Olbermann, in all his glory, speaking, nay, shouting truth to power. Every word is true, and you Bushies ought to be ashamed of what you've done to this country and to Iraq. <a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/05/14/countdown-special-comment-to-president-bush-shut-the-hell-up/" rel="nofollow">http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/05/14/countdown-special-comment-to-president-bush-shut-the-hell-up/</a> ]]>

<![CDATA[Damn straight! And Conyers informed the White House that any unilateral attacks on Iran without getting authorization from Congress will result in impeachment. Too little, too late, plenty of reasons now, but...]]>

<![CDATA[I know watching this much truth takes a little more courage than the typical cowardly, treasonous Republican can muster, but here's Keith Olbermann, in all his glory, speaking, nay, shouting truth to power. Every word is true, and you Bushies ought to be ashamed of what you've done to this country and to Iraq. <a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/05/14/countdown-special-comment-to-president-bush-shut-the-hell-up/" rel="nofollow">http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/05/14/countdown-special-comment-to-president-bush-shut-the-hell-up/</a> ]]>

<![CDATA[Even a president who can articulate a sentence would be nice.]]>

<![CDATA[<a href="http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html</a> CLINTON: Good evening. Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors. Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world. Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons. I want to explain why I have decided, with the unanimous recommendation of my national security team, to use force in Iraq; why we have acted now; and what we aim to accomplish. Six weeks ago, Saddam Hussein announced that he would no longer cooperate with the United Nations weapons inspectors called UNSCOM. They are highly professional experts from dozens of countries. Their job is to oversee the elimination of Iraq's capability to retain, create and use weapons of mass destruction, and to verify that Iraq does not attempt to rebuild that capability. The inspectors undertook this mission first 7.5 years ago at the end of the Gulf War when Iraq agreed to declare and destroy its arsenal as a condition of the ceasefire. The international community had good reason to set this requirement. Other countries possess weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles. With Saddam, there is one big difference: He has used them. Not once, but repeatedly. Unleashing chemical weapons against Iranian troops during a decade-long war. Not only against soldiers, but against civilians, firing Scud missiles at the citizens of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Iran. And not only against a foreign enemy, but even against his own people, gassing Kurdish civilians in Northern Iraq. The international community had little doubt then, and I have no doubt today, that left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will use these terrible weapons again. The United States has patiently worked to preserve UNSCOM as Iraq has sought to avoid its obligation to cooperate with the inspectors. On occasion, we've had to threaten military force, and Saddam has backed down. Faced with Saddam's latest act of defiance in late October, we built intensive diplomatic pressure on Iraq backed by overwhelming military force in the region. The UN Security Council voted 15 to zero to condemn Saddam's actions and to demand that he immediately come into compliance. Eight Arab nations -- Egypt, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, United Arab Emirates and Oman -- warned that Iraq alone would bear responsibility for the consequences of defying the UN. When Saddam still failed to comply, we prepared to act militarily. It was only then at the last possible moment that Iraq backed down. It pledged to the UN that it had made, and I quote, a clear and unconditional decision to resume cooperation with the weapons inspectors. I decided then to call off the attack with our airplanes already in the air because Saddam had given in to our demands. I concluded then that the right thing to do was to use restraint and give Saddam one last chance to prove his willingness to cooperate. I made it very clear at that time what unconditional cooperation meant, based on existing UN resolutions and Iraq's own commitments. And along with Prime Minister Blair of Great Britain, I made it equally clear that if Saddam failed to cooperate fully, we would be prepared to act without delay, diplomacy or warning. Now over the past three weeks, the UN weapons inspectors have carried out their plan for testing Iraq's cooperation. The testing period ended this weekend, and last night, UNSCOM's chairman, Richard Butler, reported the results to UN Secretary-General Annan. The conclusions are stark, sobering and profoundly disturbing. In four out of the five categories set forth, Iraq has failed to cooperate. Indeed, it actually has placed new restrictions on the inspectors. Here are some of the particulars. Iraq repeatedly blocked UNSCOM from inspecting suspect sites. For example, it shut off access to the headquarters of its ruling party and said it will deny access to the party's other offices, even though UN resolutions make no exception for them and UNSCOM has inspected them in the past. Iraq repeatedly restricted UNSCOM's ability to obtain necessary evidence. For example, Iraq obstructed UNSCOM's effort to photograph bombs related to its chemical weapons program. It tried to stop an UNSCOM biological weapons team from videotaping a site and photocopying documents and prevented Iraqi personnel from answering UNSCOM's questions. Prior to the inspection of another site, Iraq actually emptied out the building, removing not just docume